I happened to notice this morning a core similarity between atheists and lesbians. Case in point – Fundamentalists will say to an atheist “you’re going to hell”. Which, naturally enough, to an atheist is meaningless. You might as well tell the rabbit in your yard that it’s going to hell. Of course if you come around to the fundamentalist’s point of view you’ll go to heaven. Again, a meaningless option. To an atheist heaven and hell don’t exist.
And there it was. The central point linking the two. For, to an average lesbian, men don’t exist in a sexual sense. And while there may actually be “man hating lesbians” out there who hate men for the myriad of things that men have done to them and other women throughout history the actual stereotypical “man hating lesbian” doesn’t really exist.
Lesbian and atheists do something far worse than actively hate those who have arrayed themselves (whether biologically or philosophically) on the other side of the fence from them. They ignore them, or ignore their beliefs (which amounts to the same thing). Apropos of the quote by I. Shah: “Man: Kick him – he’ll forgive you. Flatter him – he may or may not see through you. But ignore him and he’ll hate you forever.”
I’ve often marveled at the volume and venom of the religious fundamentalist…but now I understand more about where their great hatred comes from, it comes from being ignored. No, they themselves are not ignored, it’s impossible to do so with all their hopping up and down and foaming at the mouth behavior. But their beliefs are. Not even the majority of mainstream religions people take the beliefs of the fundamentalists seriously and that’s GOTTA hurt, deep down inside.
(Footnote: Heaven and hell can’t exist for a number of reasons, the first is thermodynamic – they imply states of permanent stasis and that’s impossible – the entropy of a macroscopic system never decreases [it always increases] – the universe is a closed system. Sooner or later, the lights will go out in heaven. The second reason is philosophic; whether considering the alleged eternal pleasure of heaven or the alleged eternal pain of hell you’re forced to consider time and perspective. No matter how pleasurable a thing is, over time, it becomes boring and non-pleasurable. The thrill wears off as it were, the blush is off the rose, etc. The same holds true for pain – no matter how painful a thing is, over time, it becomes boring and non-painful. Maintaining an eternal state of either would either result in them becoming boring [so no longer a carrot or a stick respectively] or in the subject experiencing either to loose their self awareness -i.e. going mad [so, again, no longer a carrot and no longer a stick].
Like the protagonist in the movie Brazil – they stop torturing him when he loses his mind because more torture would be meaningless – he’s “gone” – the same holds true on the opposite extreme of endless pleasure, you’d have to stop being pleasured because, at some point, you’d be “gone”.)